Sunday, June 23, 2013

Is this social justice?

Twitter feminist find themselves in a predicament.










Some pieces of the story are missing.

  1. Why did the man feel the need to interrupt? Was he drunk or simply annoyed?
  2. When the man interrupted, did Ellen respond with an insult of her own?
  3. Did the "whole bus defend him" only after Ellen hit him?
  4. Did he attempt to hit Ellen before Ellen hit him?
  5. Why did other women tell Ellen and Sam to shut up and sit down?

Surely using racial epithets against strangers on a bus is a terrible thing to do. 

Yet somehow it doesn't seem at all better to assault strangers and then make idle threats on Twitter about how you will "kill them all" and "make them pay".

The Twitter 'feminists' however don't need any more information. A woman hit a man, and provided her reasons for doing so. Skepticism about the correctness of her actions is just "mansplaining".

In this light, just what is 'social justice'?

When a woman hears a sexist joke, she is entitled to broadcast a photo of the culprit to everyone.

When a woman hears a man more or less admit to adultery, she can put it up on Facebook for all to judge. 

Now, when a woman hears a man use racist language, she can straight up assault him.

If someone tells you they're into social justice, run the other way.

It's a dogmatic self-absorbed vigilante willing to do pretty much anything to make things more 'right' and 'just'.

23 comments:

  1. You use the same kind of language as rape apologists when shedding "doubt" on survivors stories. Your victim blaming might be what causes you to all but completly overlook the massive rasism in the described attack. Maybe pay some attention to what's actually going on?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "survivor" how do you know they were survivors when they very easily would have been perpetrators ,spoken like a true femtard assume that the male is guilty even if he is a victim of violent assault by LOWLIFE FEMINIST CREEPS LIKE AMBREENA ND ELLEN SUCH people who behave like rabid animals need to be locked up and kept as far away from society as possible so that they cannot hurt other people

      Delete
  2. Jara, you're an idiot. What's actually going on is that these tweeters are nuts. "I want that guy to die", seriously? Yes, racism* is bad, but god damn, talk about an overreaction.

    *Calling someone a "paki" is racism, but it's not "massive racism". Massive racism is lynching someone for being black. This is minor racism.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi, this is Ellen, the one whose tweets you've published without asking and who was actually there with Sam when she was racially abused on the bus. Firstly- your blog has a horribly victim blaming tone to it. Is there any excuse for these men to have harrassed us, racially or otherwise? They interrupted because of entitlement. We were two lone women, whose time they decided was theirs to waste. We asked politely for them to leave us alone, they didn't. Why is this acceptable to you? Why must we justify our feelings about being spoken to when we wanted to chat alone together? Why do you assume I insulted him? I did insofar as telling him not to talk to me was an insult, and getting back to our own conversation. In fact, weirdly, this did not work. It's almost as if they had no respect for us or out autonomy to exist on a bus without unwanted attention from sniggering men.

    As for the bus full of people, they defended the actions of 2 men who were harassing women, before any racist remarks had been made. They yelled for us to sit down and shut up, baying at the women to stop making a fuss. When he called Sam a paki the bus cheered- have you any idea how fucked up that is?

    My actions were what they were, a reaction of fear and anger and righteous indignation that this straight, white man felt it ok to harass us in a sexist, racist way. I don't think what I did was wrong, he deserved a slap.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Shadow of a DoubtJune 27, 2013 at 10:41 AM

      Your actions were assault any way you look at it. I hope the guy you slapped doesn't ever see your twitter account as that is often used as evidence, as much as you were wrong, I don't think you don't deserve anything as severe as a criminal record for it, but you could get one.

      Delete
    2. Hey Ellen. Why do most of twitter conversations between you and your fempals consist of things like sending *hugs* to each other?

      Delete
    3. Shadow of a Doubt wrote: I don't think you don't deserve anything as severe as a criminal record for it, but you could get one.


      Huh? The femtard fuckwit assaulted someone; of course she deserves to be prosecuted... given the Brits notoriety for physical violence at the slightest provocation, she is damned lucky she didn't end up having shit knocked out her.

      Cheers, Solius

      Delete
    4. "Horrible victim-blaming tone" Well, game, set, match, I wonder why you bothered to write anything else when you totally nailed it right out of the gate, you poor, poor dear.

      Delete
    5. ELLEN get some medical help YOU ARE A DELUSIONAL SOCIOPATH WHO ASSAULTED A MAN IN PUBLIC and then having your head so far up your feminist ass you keep on braying about blaming the victim even though it was he who was a vicim of your criminal assault , you should be locked up in jail thats where feminazi criminals like you belong, did it ever occur to you in the last remaining logically functioning cells of your TINY BIGOTED FEMINIST MIND that it is you who are blaming the victim of a psychotic feminazi attack ,you are so oblivious to things that u dont even seem to know whatgarbage you spew .

      "My actions were what they were, a reaction of fear and anger and righteous indignation that this straight, white man felt it ok to harass us in a sexist, racist way. I don't think what I did was wrong, he deserved a slap."

      WELL THEN AS PER YOUR OWN LOGIC
      "A man can be justified in saying that his actions were just a reaction of anger and righteous indignation that this psychotic femtard assaulted him in a bigoted feminazi way and he wouldnt think it was wrong she deserved a rape !"

      listen idiot get this in your peabrain if you justify violence against men , it will be absolutely justified for men to justify retaliation against femtards like you.

      Delete
  4. @Ellen:
    "Hi, this is Ellen, the one whose tweets you've published without asking"

    So? Your tweets are public.

    "Firstly- your blog has a horribly victim blaming tone to it. Is there any excuse for these men to have harrassed us, racially or otherwise?"

    There's no victim blaming here. Uberfeminist even says "Surely using racial epithets against strangers on a bus is a terrible thing to do."

    The point is that being a victim doesn't entitle you to do anything you want in response. It doesn't excuse egregious counter-abuse. You really do need to justify "I want that guy to die", as well as hitting him. That's far more fucked up than "paki". If you had hit me, I'd hit you right the fuck back, and you would have deserved it.

    By the way, how do you know he was straight? Oh, that's right, you don't. You're assuming.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Pacifism protects oppressors. Kill oppressors.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ellen used the word "cunt" several times in the tweets above. "Cunt" is, if we're to believe radfems and SJWs, an extremely oppressive word. Do you want to kill her, too? Or are we once again going to see a ridiculous double standard?

      And for the record, killing people is wrong, fuckwit.

      Delete
  6. Er, no. Anyone who is racially abused and sexually harassed has a right to defend themselves and respond. It is not "more fucked up" to hit your aggressor than to racially abuse them. Kindly fuck off.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Eh, no; not in a civilized society. Calling someone a "paki whore" or a "nigger cunt", while offensive and disgusting, is not a reason to resort to violence.

      Solius

      Delete
    2. if it is not "more fucked up" to hit your aggressor than to racially abuse them. then
      it is not "more fucked up" to rape femtards who hit you than to violently assault males

      if you have a right to defend yourself and respond so do males , and if you are the perpetrator and assault males they also have the same right to defend themselves as well as retaliate to your pyschotic feminazi violence .

      Delete
  7. The proper response to abusive words is physical violence apparently, I can't tell if Sad Kant is a troll or his mommy never sat him down to teach him about sticks and stones. Just for the record, I'm pretty sure every schoolyard bully uses the same logic to hit people.

    ReplyDelete
  8. 'Calling someone a "paki" is racism, but it's not "massive racism". Massive racism is lynching someone for being black. This is minor racism.'

    My God, you couldn't be any stupider if you tried.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If you think a racial slur is in any way comparable to a racially motivated murder, you're the stupid one.

      Delete
  9. Must not have black women standing up for themselves; up would become down, white people might actually be held accountable for their coercive powers all over the world.

    You menz make me laugh. Quaking in your boots as you are. You obviously have far too much time on your hands. Get a life.

    Who the fuck are you to say how racist abuse if felt and whether it is minor or not? I class that as a serious incident of abuse and for the record, don't know where you are in the world, but use of that word is illegal in the UK and a pre-emptive strike to defend oneself whether it be verbal or physical, is our right by law.

    I have a feeling you're in the States where lynching of PoC is the norm and for you, that's when PoC can justify any defence. Well, it's commonly known that America actively encourages racial segregation so who knows, you might be right when it concerns the people in your own back yard. Here though, nah, for what it's worth we have an illusion of caring for our non-whites.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "I have a feeling you're in the States where lynching of PoC is the norm and for you, that's when PoC can justify any defence."

      You are such an idiot. The only modern lynching that is the norm in US is done by feminists against men suspected of sexual assault.

      Delete
  10. Another example of Feminists not comporting themselves like the adults they claim to be.

    And then they wonder why, when they make assertions such as this, the rest of the world just scoffs and goes back to ignoring them? Haha. Continue trying to keep your cake and eat it too, Feminists. Nevermind the big ol' meanies documenting your juvenile behavior and exposing it to the world. ;)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. When I hear how mean people were to this "acting out" types, I now think of this poor victim:

      http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=e56_1375020071

      Delete